| Teaching Staff
|
Prof. Dr. Abdulvahit ÇAKIR |
| Language of Instruction |
İngilizce (English) |
| Type Of Course |
Compulsory |
| Prerequisites |
None |
| Recommended Optional Programme Component |
|
| Course Objectives |
The students will have knowledge and skills about approaches, models, and applications pertaining to academic discourse. |
| Course Content |
Approaches, models, and applications pertaining to academic discourse |
| Learning Outcomes (LO) |
General information about approaches, models, and applications pertaining to academic discourse
Knowledge about written and spoken genres of academic discourse,
Knowledge about the structure of research article
Practice of IMRAD and CARS models
Skills to use meta discourse markers |
| Mode of Delivery |
Face to face |
| Course Outline |
| Week |
Topics |
| 1. Week |
Introduction to, models, and applications pertaining to academic discourse |
| 2. Week |
Introduction to, models, and applications pertaining to academic discourse |
| 3. Week |
Spoken genres of academic discourse |
| 4. Week |
Written genres of academic discourse |
| 5. Week |
Written genres of academic discourse |
| 6. Week |
Structure of research article |
| 7. Week |
Mid-term written exam |
| 8. Week |
IMRAD model |
| 9. Week |
IMRAD model |
| 10. Week |
CARS model |
| 11. Week |
CARS model |
| 12. Week |
CARS model |
| 13. Week |
Metadiscourse markers |
| 14. Week |
Metadiscourse markers |
|
| Assessment |
| |
Percentage(%) |
| Mid-term (%) |
16 |
| Quizes (%) |
|
| Homeworks/Term papers (%) |
24 |
| Practice (%) |
24 |
| Labs (%) |
|
| Projects/Field Work (%) |
18 |
| Seminars/Workshops (%) |
|
| Final (%) |
60 |
| Other (%) |
|
| Total(%) |
100 |
|
| Course Book (s) and/or References |
1. Laura Alba-Juez. (2009). Perspectives on discourse analysis: theory and practice. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
2. Rasinger, Sebastian M. (2008). Quantitative research in linguistics: an introduction. Bloomsbury Academic.
3. Hua, Zhu. (2011). The language and intercultural communication reader. Taylor & Francis.
|
| Work Placement(s) |
|
| The Relationship between Program Qualifications (PQ) and Course Learning Outcomes (LO) |
| ÖÇ1 | ÖÇ2 | ÖÇ3 | ÖÇ4 | ÖÇ5 | PY1 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | PY2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 4 | PY3 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 5 | PY4 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | PY5 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | PY6 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 5 | PY7 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 4 | PY8 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | PY9 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 2 | PY10 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | PY11 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 4 | PY12 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | PY13 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
1= Very weak 2= Weak 3= Moderate 4= Strong 5= Very strong |